OH, THAT WORD!
The highlight of my writers’ group this
week was the reading of a poem that included the dreaded “f” word. During the critique
session that followed one member strongly objected to the use of that word. Several group members then objected
to her objection. It was a fascinating little scenario. I found myself acting
as piggy-in-the-middle, fully appreciative of the point of view on either side
of the divide.
How is it that this four-letter
word has such power to polarise a group of people? There’s no doubt the word divides on the basis of age. In reality
a 15th century word describing the act of sexual intercourse, it is
today used by many young people as an expletive to express impatience,
annoyance, anger, a situation beyond repair or to give a strong emphasis. Occasionally, they use it to describe the sex
act. An older person considers its use to be crude, lewd and vulgar, even if
it’s not in the context of sex. Then there's the religious divide. A religious person is likely to object to it on
the grounds that such vulgarity would be a disqualifier to having a clean heart
and mind and, what’s more, incur the condemnation of their peers.
But it is, after all, only a word, isn’t it?
My own view is that its traditional
vulgarity and over-use has trivialised sexual intercourse. For me, it detracts
from the sacredness that is inherent to sexual union in a committed and
lifelong relationship. However, in
terms of the poem that was under discussion, I was not offended. It was
appropriate in terms of its context and its current usage as an intensifier. The person who objected did so out of a personal aversion. This was clearly outside the requirement of critiquing the actual writing, which is to assess the structure, tempo, scanning, etc .
Would I use this word myself? No. But there may come a time when one of my fictional characters might.
Would I use this word myself? No. But there may come a time when one of my fictional characters might.
No comments:
Post a Comment